NOTICE AND DUTY TO FORMALLY SUBMIT WRITTEN REJECTION OF IHR AMENDMENTS
I am requesting for you to formally reject the Amendments to the International Health Regulations
I am sending this Concerning Violations of Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens) and Obligations Erga Omnes in the Adoption of International Health Regulations Amendments
TO: All Permanent Missions to the United Nations, Ministries of Foreign Affairs, Ministries of Health, and Legal Counsel of WHO Member States
REFERENCE: IOJ/IHR/NOTICE-DEFAULT/2025
- NATURE AND LEGAL BASIS OF THIS NOTICE AND DUTY TO FORMALLY SUBMIT WRITTEN REJECTION OF IHR AMENDMENTS
Pursuant to Articles 46, 53, 64, and 69 of the Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties (1969), Article 56 of the International Health Regulations (2005), customary international law principles governing treaty invalidity, and the doctrine of obligations erga omnes as established by the International Court of Justice in Barcelona Traction, Light and Power Company, Limited (Belgium v. Spain) [1970] ICJ Rep 3, Interest of Justice hereby serves this formal Notice of Default upon all WHO Member States concerning the continued implementation and prospective adoption of procedurally invalid amendments to the International Health Regulations.
This Notice constitutes formal invocation of the doctrine of fundamental breach (breach going to the root) as codified in international treaty law, and serves as definitive notification that the continued implementation of the aforementioned amendments constitutes ongoing violations of peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens) from which no derogation is permitted, creating obligations erga omnes that bind all members of the international community.
The legal foundation for this Notice rests upon the established principle that procedural requirements for treaty modification constitute rules of fundamental importance whose violation renders resulting instruments void ab initio, as confirmed by the International Court of Justice in Case Concerning the Land and Maritime Boundary between Cameroon and Nigeria (Cameroon v. Nigeria) [2002] ICJ Rep 303, ¶ 265.
- SPECIFICATION OF DEFAULTS AND VIOLATIONS
- Procedural Nullity of 2024 Amendments Under Article 55(2)
The 2024 amendments to the International Health Regulations suffer from fatal procedural defects that render them absolutely void under international law. Specifically, the Director-General's transmission of proposed amendment texts on February 20, 2024—exactly three months prior to the 77th World Health Assembly opening on May 20, 2024—constitutes a manifest violation of the mandatory four-month notice period prescribed by Article 55(2) of the IHR.
The provision states unequivocally that "[t]he text of any proposed amendment shall be communicated by the Director-General to all States Parties at least four months before the Health Assembly at which it is proposed for consideration." The use of the imperative "shall" creates a non-derogable obligation, as confirmed by the International Law Commission's authoritative commentary that such mandatory language admits of no exceptions absent express textual provision.
This temporal requirement has attained the status of jus cogens through consistent state practice spanning over five decades, during which the four-month period has been scrupulously observed in all prior amendment processes. The International Law Commission has recognized that procedural requirements integral to treaty-making processes constitute peremptory norms when they embody "a norm accepted and recognized by the international community of States as a whole as a norm from which no derogation is permitted" within the meaning of Article 53 of the Vienna Convention.
- Procedural Nullity of 2022 Amendments Under WHO Rules of Procedure
The purported adoption of IHR amendments during the 75th World Health Assembly in 2022 suffered from equally fundamental procedural defects. Video evidence demonstrates conclusively that Committee A proceedings on May 27, 2022, failed to comply with Rule 85 of the WHO Rules of Procedure, which mandates that "[t]he presence of a majority of a committee shall, however, be required for a question to be put to a vote."
Documentary evidence establishes that no verification of quorum occurred prior to the purported adoption, no formal vote was conducted as required by Article 73 of the WHO Rules of Procedure, and attendance records demonstrate the absence of the required majority. These procedural failures constitute manifest violations of internal law of fundamental importance within the meaning of Article 46(1) of the Vienna Convention, rendering any resulting obligations void ab initio.
- Violations of Jus Cogens and Obligations Erga Omnes
The procedural requirements violated herein have evolved beyond mere conventional obligations to constitute peremptory norms of general international law. The International Court of Justice has consistently held that certain procedural safeguards in treaty-making processes embody fundamental principles of international law that bind all states regardless of consent, as established in Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius [2019] ICJ Rep 95.
The obligation to ensure procedural regularity in international treaty-making constitutes an obligation erga omnes—owed to the international community as a whole—the violation of which creates both individual and collective responsibilities for non-recognition and remediation. As articulated by the International Law Commission in its Articles on State Responsibility, "[n]o State shall recognize as lawful a situation created by a serious breach of an obligation arising under a peremptory norm of general international law."
III. LEGAL CONSEQUENCES AND MEMBER STATE OBLIGATIONS
- Absolute Nullity Ab Initio
Pursuant to Article 69(1) of the Vienna Convention, "[a] treaty the invalidity of which is established under the present Convention is void. The provisions of a void treaty have no legal force." The procedural violations documented herein render both sets of amendments void from their inception, creating no legal obligations and conferring no legal rights upon any party.
The International Court of Justice has confirmed in Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia) [1997] ICJ Rep 7, ¶ 47, that procedurally defective instruments must be treated as "without legal force or effect" within domestic legal systems. Member States implementing these void amendments thereby violate both their international legal obligations and their domestic constitutional duties.
- Duty of Non-Recognition
Under Article 41(2) of the International Law Commission's Articles on State Responsibility, States are under an absolute duty "not to recognize as lawful a situation created by a serious breach of an obligation arising under a peremptory norm of general international law, nor render aid or assistance in maintaining that situation." This duty operates automatically and requires no formal invocation by affected parties.
The continued implementation of procedurally invalid amendments constitutes precisely such prohibited recognition and assistance. States must immediately cease all implementation activities, withdraw any domestic legislation or regulations based on the invalid amendments, and formally declare their non-recognition of the amendments' legal effect.
- Obligation of Restitution In Integrum
Article 71(1)(b) of the Vienna Convention mandates that parties must "eliminate as far as possible the consequences of any act performed in reliance upon" a treaty provision that conflicts with a peremptory norm of general international law. This obligation of restitutio in integrum requires complete restoration of the legal position that would have existed absent the violation.
Member States must therefore not merely suspend implementation but actively remediate any changes to domestic law, policy, or practice undertaken in reliance upon the invalid amendments. This includes rescinding implementing legislation, reversing administrative actions, and providing appropriate compensation for any damages caused by reliance upon void legal instruments.
- FORMAL DEMANDS AND REQUIRED ACTIONS
In light of the foregoing legal analysis and pursuant to established principles of international law, Interest of Justice hereby demands that all WHO Member States immediately undertake the following legally mandated actions:
- Immediate Cessation of Implementation
- Formal Declaration of Non-Recognition: Issue immediate diplomatic notifications to the WHO Director-General and all other Member States declaring that both the 2022 and 2024 IHR amendments are procedurally invalid and legally void ab initio.
- Suspension of Domestic Implementation: Immediately suspend all domestic legislation, regulations, policies, and administrative actions undertaken in reliance upon the invalid amendments.
- Withdrawal from Adoption Processes: Cease all participation in processes aimed at implementing, enforcing, or promoting the adoption of the procedurally invalid amendments.
- Remedial Actions Required
- Legislative Remediation: Enact appropriate domestic legislation confirming that procedurally invalid international instruments create no binding obligations and cannot override domestic constitutional requirements.
- Administrative Review: Conduct comprehensive review of all health-related policies and procedures to identify and eliminate any provisions based upon the void amendments.
- Diplomatic Coordination: Coordinate with other Member States to develop alternative frameworks for international health cooperation based on valid legal foundations and respect for sovereignty.
- Prospective Safeguards
- Enhanced Procedural Scrutiny: Establish enhanced domestic procedures for reviewing international health instruments to prevent future implementation of procedurally defective agreements.
- Constitutional Protection: Ensure that domestic constitutional protections for fundamental rights cannot be circumvented through implementation of international health measures lacking valid legal foundation.
- Democratic Accountability: Require legislative approval for any international health agreements that would affect fundamental rights or create binding domestic obligations.
- TEMPORAL URGENCY AND IRREPARABLE HARM
The extraordinary urgency of this Notice stems from the imminent and irreparable harm that continued implementation of void legal instruments inflicts upon both individual Member States and the international legal order itself. Each day of continued implementation:
- Compounds Legal Liability: Creates additional exposure to civil and criminal liability for government officials implementing legally void measures;
- Undermines Constitutional Order: Further erodes the fundamental principle that government action must be grounded in valid legal authority;
- Damages International Law: Contributes to the degradation of international treaty law by normalizing procedural violations and non-compliance with fundamental requirements;
- Threatens Democratic Governance: Enables implementation of restrictions on fundamental rights without valid legal authorization or democratic consent.
The doctrine of rebus sic stantibus (fundamental change of circumstances) as codified in Article 62 of the Vienna Convention provides additional grounds for immediate action, as the withdrawal of the United States from WHO has fundamentally altered the regulatory and institutional framework upon which the amendments were predicated.
- WARNING OF CONSEQUENCES FOR NON-COMPLIANCE
Member States that fail to comply with the legally mandated actions specified herein face serious legal consequences under both domestic and international law:
- Individual Liability
Government officials who continue to implement void legal instruments may face personal civil and criminal liability under domestic law, as implementation of legally unauthorized measures constitutes ultra vires governmental action in virtually all constitutional systems.
- State Responsibility
States that continue implementation face potential claims under international law for violations of their obligations to respect peremptory norms and refrain from recognizing situations created by serious breaches of jus cogens.
- Institutional Consequences
Continued participation in procedurally invalid frameworks undermines Member States' standing within the international community and may affect their participation in future treaty-making processes.
VII. AVAILABILITY OF ALTERNATIVE LEGAL REMEDIES
Should Member States fail to comply with this Notice within thirty (30) days of receipt, Interest of Justice reserves the right to pursue all available legal remedies, including but not limited to:
- Formal Dispute Resolution: Initiation of proceedings under Article 56 of the International Health Regulations and other applicable dispute resolution mechanisms;
- Domestic Legal Challenges: Support for domestic constitutional challenges to implementation of void international instruments;
- International Litigation: Pursuit of advisory proceedings before international tribunals concerning the legal validity of the disputed amendments;
- Civil Society Mobilization: Coordination of global civil society efforts to ensure compliance with fundamental principles of international law.
VIII. CONCLUSION AND FINAL DEMAND
The evidence of procedural invalidity documented herein is overwhelming and legally dispositive. No reasonable interpretation of applicable international law can sustain the validity of amendments adopted in manifest violation of fundamental procedural requirements. The duty of non-recognition is not discretionary but mandatory under established principles of international law.
Interest of Justice therefore calls upon all Member States to demonstrate their commitment to the rule of law, constitutional governance, and fundamental human rights by immediately ceasing implementation of the procedurally invalid IHR amendments and undertaking the remedial actions specified herein.
The international community's response to this crisis will determine whether the post-war international legal order retains its foundational commitment to procedural regularity and democratic accountability, or whether it will tolerate the erosion of fundamental legal principles in pursuit of expedient but illegitimate exercises of power.
WHEREFORE, Member States are hereby formally notified that continued implementation of the procedurally invalid International Health Regulations amendments constitutes ongoing violations of peremptory norms of general international law, creates individual and collective legal liability, and demands immediate cessation and remediation as specified herein.
Cordially,
This Notice is distributed simultaneously to all 194 WHO Member States and constitutes formal legal notice under international law. Receipt acknowledgment is requested but not required for legal effectiveness.
Updates
Today: Interest Of Justice is counting on you
Interest Of Justice needs your help with “NOTICE AND DUTY TO FORMALLY SUBMIT WRITTEN REJECTION OF IHR AMENDMENTS”. Join Interest Of Justice and 86 supporters today.
Sign this petition
57 Comments
After being seriously injured from the covid “vaccine” I am especially supportive of personal sovereignty in making health decisions. No one organization, internationally or nationally should control my health decisions.
I do not agree at all with the existence of the World Health Organization, which I consider to be totally corrupted. The only acceptable solution is to terminate it definitively, unconditionally.
I do not agree at all with the existence of the World Health Organization, which I consider to be totally corrupted. The only acceptable solution is to terminate it definitively, unconditionally.
We cant have international globalists chasing after maximum gains and profits, dictate how independent countries and their citizens should conform to their wild wishes!!!
I agree with JFK’s position wholeheartedly.
Ilmoitan hylkääväni IHR muutokset!
We need to stop it NOW!!
I agree with Octavia Glomes. Stop this now and forever. OFF the table now!
Freedom is the biggest value
Its the right thing todo
No one has autonomy over anyone else’s body. Especially these globalist agendites who’s goal is to enslave and therefore control everyone.
I am concerned that in case of an international health emergency, unelected bureaucrats in international agencies could override national decisions on how to handle, opening the way for disaster as we have witnessed with the Covid emergency. This must not happen again.
Reject the amendments and the WHO.
The IHR amendments are draconian and must be rejected!
It is extremely important- on every level- to have autonomy over one’s own health.
The amendments to the IHR are U.N. democratic and would cause the United States and individual states to relinquish control of authority of public health systems and all that it entails to an international body controlled by private, corporate interests FOR private, unelected corporate interests which have no duty or authority to protect the public health, welfare or safety
I support IHR formally invoking the most powerful enforcement mechanisms available under international law, creating binding obligations upon all 194 WHO Member States to immediately cease implementation of legally void instruments or face potential individual and collective liability under established principles of state responsibility and treaty lai
I support IOJ’s position on these issues!!!
I have absolutely no faith in the WHO.
I don’t want the. Who in charge of my health
I do not think the WHO should have any authority over our public health systems and reject all that they stand for.
I reject WHO
Health freedom is paramount to maintaining US sovereignty in the ever increasing elitist attempts steamroll of our constitutional rights.
These are crucial issues that are ignored by the very group who caused them, and are not being held accountable.
No country should sign away our sovereignty to govern ourselves.. the uk has not had a referendum on this matter so I do not consent.
the IHR amendments put demicratic principles at highest risk which in fact is an illegal transfer of power to a “NGO” without any formal legitimation
i do not agree with the who
Because WHO is closer to Bill Gates and is from the Chinese Communist Party.
WHO is private organization and can’t rule over we the people
No insane, mass murderer, and his ilk, should be allowed to demand people take poisons to kill us.
The WHO is NOT elected by the people. They have NO RIGHT to tell anyone what to do or how to do it.
The WHO has now inflicted irreversible harm onto the human species, and must be held responsible, not given more powers to harm, they have lost all trust.
Everyone deserves to live freely and make their own health decisions.
I do not believe that unelected and unaccountable bureaucrats, who have immunity from prosecution, and who are heavily funded by special interest groups, and who have wrong about so much already, should have any say over us or should in any way usurp our sovereignty. Our leaders do not, IMO, have the right to sign our countries up to this technocratic and totalitarian power grab.
I don’t want foreign, unelected, self-appointed bureaucrats taking away my or my family’s sovereignty!!!!!
WOAH/WHO/WEF/UN – ALL MUST BE CULLED! FIRST THEY CAME FOR THE OSTRICHES…………………… OH HELL NO TO THE INSANITY OF ‘ONE HEALTH’! As if every unique being were interchangeable parts of a soulless AI machine of total slavery! If only every country exited the WHO! KEEP UP THE STRUGGLE! BE VIGILANT! NO RESTING ON LAURELS! MERS! MONEYPOX! All those WHO/WEF/UN control freaks, BUGGER OFF AND LEAVE US ALONE! NO TO YOUR CORRUPT MONEY-MAKING RACKETS! SCREW THE HYPOCHONDRIA GERMAPHOBIC FEAR HYSTERIA! DO NOT CONSENT! Avian flu is for the birds! RESIST! Can’t say this often enough! The Military/Industrial Complex and the Biowarfare/industrial Complex, WEF agenda and the evils assaulting humanity are from one and the same source – it is the 99% against the diabolical GREED of the 0.01% who should not be in charge of anything! And BIG pHARMa is an arsenal making permanently sickly addicted slaves dependent on their products – the complete opposite of actual health. SERIOUSLY FOLKS! KEEP FIGHTING! Can’t say this often enough! The WHO/UN/WEF are totally criminal entities that must be litigated and dismantled off the face of the earth and its upper level employees tried and jailed. Nothing THE WORLD HELL ORGANIZATION does has any legitimacy. EQUITY is Orwellian doublespeak for equal ENSLAVEMENT of us proles under the technocratic parasitical malevolent rule by control freak, power-mad psychos. The word EQUITY makes my blood boil whenever I hear it now that I understand its true meaning. A vast majority of so-called leaders and Public ‘Serpents’ around the world have been bribed, blackmailed/coerced into serving the interests of their technocratic New World Ordure parasite masters and not We the People. The world needs a lot more rejections of the UN/WHO’s nefarious schemes. Peddling pure poison! Folks have to wake up to reality: health comes from organic diet, daily exercise and clean living and never from a needle or a pill except in dire, rare traumatic injuries. Can’t say this often enough! It was NEVER about health! The Powers That Should Not Be were ALWAYS about they want you DEAD or a SLAVE! This is a painful truth to accept but we the people must wake up and fight back! And toxic injections were/are a huge part of their arsenal! KEEP FIGHTING! All the perps who pushed this greatest crime against humanity, all the way down to the local level, must get their comeuppances! Proudly ANTI-VAXX! Reiterating for the sake of newbies and to support this post. Ban all vaccine jabs! There has never been a ‘safe and effective’ vaccine since Edward Jenner’s fraud over 200 years ago as per ‘Dissolving Illusions’ by Suzanne Humphries and ‘Turtles All the Way Down’ by Anonymous. Health can never come from a needle or pills, but from healthy eating, healthy exercise and healthy living! virustruth.net JAB INJURIES: GROSS CALAMARI BLOOD CLOTS/AUTISM TSUNAMI/SADS/TURBO CANCER/BIZARRE TERMINAL ILLNESSES: More tragic victims of the ruling parasite genocidal enslavement agenda, sacrificed on the altar of psychopathic greed and hatred of humanity. PSYCHOPATHS! MEGALOMANIACS! The monsters in human skin suits who rule the world get a sadistic vampiric thrill and boost from perpetrating the vilest most demonic crimes against the most vulnerable (babies and small children) and then corrupting the system to get away with it scot free! We the People must stop them, there are a lot more of us than them! Please check out this substack! ponerology.substack.com Divide and rule! Agents provocateurs anyone, FALSE FLAGS, propaganda social engineering psyops? Keeping us proles at each others’ throats while the globalist technocrat predators laugh all the way to the BIS and The Bank of Rothschild’s! The terrible senators, Mark ‘Carnage’, horrifying Governor ‘Gruesome Newscum’, ‘Lone Scum’, Soros, ‘Benedict’ Biden and Harris and even Trump, Vance, and ‘Ramaswampy’ et al are blatant fully owned and operated puppets of their globalist technocrat parasite masters same as other numerous ‘PUBLIC SERPENTS’ infesting by design from above, the bureaucratic apparatus. BURN BACK BETTER! CREATIVITY! ARTISTRY! IMAGINATION! SPIRITUALITY! HUMOR! LOVING KINDNESS! These are the best ways to fight THEM! HELL NO TO STARGATE! HELL NO TO DEEPSEEK! HELL NO TO AI! technocracy.news Life everywhere is being assaulted by THE TECHNOCRATIC OMNIWAR! RESIST! DO NOT CONSENT TO ALL THINGS DIGITAL, ‘SMART’, AI, 5G, NO CASH – ALL OF IT! dhughes.substack.com Technocrat ruling class psychos get a sadistic thrill from their powers over life and death and hurting all who stand in their way and they need the resources worldwide to build their digital total slavery control grids (herd survivors into 15 minute city digital prisons)! AI is designed to be anti-human/anti-life programmed by technocrat control freak psychos – garbage in = garbage out. Everyone got along just fine without all these absurd and downright satanic electronic gadgets that did not exist until recently. NOBODY NEEDS THIS AI CRAP!
I DO NOT SUBSCRIBE TO THEIR CONTROL
The IHR amendments need to be rejected even though President Trump has withdrawn the US from the WHO.
I do not wish to give up my sovereignity. I do not agree to give the UN such overreaching power.
I wish to see far more input from those it affects – the REGULAR PEOPLE need their voices heard and their wishes incorporated. My dream: NO MESSING WITH HUMAN GENETICS. And instead of allowing the creating of bioweapons to enable a money-making “pandemic” let Nature, the wisest of all of us…take it’s course without man-made interference, for God’s sake!!!
The WHO will be the Trojan Horse to perpetual COVID-19-like future pandemics and their purpose in the management of such is for profit not health. It was/is never about the protecting the health of the human.
IHR falls outside of New Zealands true sovereign jurisdiction of He Wakaputanga 1835 Declaration of Independence. We are an independent and sovereign nation of New Zealand with rights to address any global announcements by WHO from an independent sovereign position. The current New Zealand Government is defacto and does not represent New Zealanders under the He Wakaputanga Constitution still the legal document of precedence in New Zealand law. On behalf of our members of the Wakaminenga Maori Government, Nu Tireni New Zealanda. I reject the IHR Amendments
MERT JOT AKAROM
I am signing because I value my complete US constitutional rights to be fully informed all all medical advantages and disadvantages as well as making the final choice about the safety and wisdom of any medical or nutritional use. WHO’s leadership did not use language that protected the basic rights of the nation and its people and that showed utmost respect for others making the choices that are in their best interests. It would be craziness to allow the WHO to have any control beyond suggestions in normal circumstances and this becomes stronger in conditions where too many people are pressured needlessly by fear-mongering and by emotional manipulation to urge choices where certain people or organizations may reap huge financial gains and other conflicts of interests from the very moves they are pushing onto others. Only fools rush in with such a loaded situation of harm. It is time for the entire world to jump ship if they have any sanity left and any decency toward their own citizens.
I do not agree at all with the existence of the World Health Organization, which I consider to be totally corrupted. The only acceptable solution is to terminate it definitively, unconditionally.
I want to live !!!!
Rejecting the IHR Treaty Amendments is of the greatest importance for all citizens in the world, not just the US and Israel who already have rejected. The dead line is now. thank You.
This is the most important ‘TO DO’ NOW! Mr. President
We do not wish to be ruled by the WHO
Dismantling the WHO is a start. The enslavement of humanity has been centuries in the making and is infested in every government, institution/agency, NGO, etc. The United Nations is the head of the snake and must be cut off. It stands in stark, direct and dangerous conflict with US interests. The President’s withdrawal of the US from the UN offers the only protection we have against Agenda 2030, One Health, Bio-Digital Convergence, the Digital Gulag and the rest of the United Nations’ rein of terror and destruction.
Write a Reply or Comment
You should Sign Up account to post comment.
or